Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Hatching asynchrony in the house wren, Troglodytes aedon: A test of the brood-reduction hypothesis

  • R. Given Harper(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Steven A. Juliano
    ,
  • Charles F. Thompson
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Illinois State University
Scholarship:
Journal Article
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

We tested the brood-reduction hypothesis by adding three nestlings to naturally occurring synchronous and asynchronous broods of the house wren (Troglodytes aedon) in order to mimic food shortages for the broods. Two types of controls were established in which brood size remained unchanged: those in which nestlings were exchanged among broods and those in which no nestlings were exchanged. The critical test of the hypothesis was in 1988 when there was a food shortage for enlarged broods. Although brood reduction occurred, enlarged synchronous broods produced as many fledglings as did enlarged asynchronous broods, and fledging mass was similar. Juvenile recapture 2-8 weeks after fledging and offspring recruitment to subsequent breeding populations were not related to treatment. The results are not consistent with the brood-reduction hypothesis as an explanation for the occurrence of hatching asynchrony in the house wren.

Scholarship

Output type

Scholarship:
Journal Article
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 76-83 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Behavioral Ecology (Volume 3, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/1992

Publication status

Published - 03/1992

ISSN

1045-2249

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0027047776

Funding Details

We thank the ParkLands Foundation, East Bay Camp, and the Sears and Davis families for allowing us to conduct this study on their properties, and J. Budhabhatti, J. Cav-itt, N. Drilling, M. Hampton, L. Johnson, A. Lush, A. Neill, K. Petersen, G. Slack, S. Swartz, K. Thompson, R. Watts, and K. Yohn for assistance in the field and laboratory. This paper was improved by the constructive comments of J. Pieman and T. Slagsvold. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant BSR 86-15296.
FunderFunding number
NSF
BSR 86-15296